Riverkeeper's First Water Sampling Patrol Highlights Importance of Disinfection
May 28, 2015
Riverkeeper Team
First 2015 Water Quality Report
The first of six Hudson River Estuary water quality sampling patrols of the 2015 season is complete, and the results are posted at riverkeeper.org.
Note that the results presented here and on the Web represent a snapshot in time, and are not indicative of water quality today. We encourage the public to explore the historical data as one way to make informed choices about where and when to enter the water.
Hudson River Monitoring Results, May 2015
We observed excellent water quality at almost all of the 74 sites we sampled from May 11-14, which we would expect after a prolonged stretch of dry weather. The most extreme exception was at Piermont Pier, where we observed bacterial counts as high as our lab can typically count at the point where two sewage treatment plants have a combined outfall. The plants are designed to treat sewage, so we should expect water free of fecal bacteria coming from this combined outfall. So we asked the Department of Environmental Conservation to investigate.
Following sampling, inquiries to the sewer plants and permit reviews, the DEC was able to explain the high counts. We sampled on May 12, just three days before South Rockland Sewer District #1 is required to begin seasonal disinfection of its effluent. (The Orangetown sewage treatment plant, which discharges at the same point, is required to start disinfecting May 1, while the effluent from Westchester County’s plant in nearby Yonkers must be disinfected year-round.) Sewage goes through multiple stages of treatment, with disinfection typically the final step.
The combined outfall for the sewer districts serving several towns in Southeastern Rockland County are permitted to discharge up to 48.9 million gallons of treated sewage per day. As we learned, “treated” means different things at different times of the year. The only visible sign of this discharge is often nothing more than a glassy sheen as can be seen in this photo courtesy of Laurie Seeman.
Without disinfection potentially harmful microbes are discharged to the water. Because many municipal plants in the Hudson River watershed are required to disinfect their effluent only during the recreational season, the bacterial counts we observed are probably typical of many Winter and Spring discharges throughout the watershed, as well as year-round discharges from a handful of municipal sewage plants and many smaller non-municipal plants that aren’t now required to disinfect at all. Riverkeeper advocates for disinfection at more plants, using UV light, which kills microbes without using chlorine that can poison fish habitat if not properly used.
The good news? Disinfection is a reality now at plants discharging to the Albany Pool, with the completion of major work in the first year of a 15-year Long Term Control Plan for reducing combined sewer overflows in six Capital District communities. The data that we and the communities gather will tell us how much of an impact this important infrastructure investment negotiated by the Department of Environmental Conservation has on water quality in this long-suffering stretch of the river.
Stay tuned soon for the results of the first round of community sampling events on Hudson River tributaries and New York City-area public water access points. Data for the Sparkill Creek and Pocantico River are already available at Riverkeeper.org.
Related campaigns
Water quality monitoring
Riverkeeper is the go-to source for information about the quality of the water along the Hudson River and its tributaries
Remediating and preventing contamination
Cleaning up decades of pollution and preventing more requires scientific understanding, targeted legal action, and sustained advocacy
Emerging and unregulated contaminants
Toxic chemicals can harm the health of people, wildlife, aquatic ecosystems